Skip to main content

Art has long been seen as more than just a creative outlet or decorative accent. For centuries, fine art has also been viewed by many as a store of value and marker of status. More recently, art has gained attention as an investment asset class that can produce compelling risk-adjusted returns over time.

In fact, art investing has significantly outperformed more traditional asset classes like stocks, bonds, and real estate over the past 25 years according to the Citi Global Art Market Chart. But there are also complexities, illiquidity issues, high fees, and risks involved with investing in art.

So does art truly represent a smart investment opportunity for investors focused on portfolio growth? Or is art better left to collectors who value the creative, aesthetic, and social returns of owning great works over the potential financial rewards?

This comprehensive guide on art as an asset class will explore both sides of this debate through an objective lens. Specifically, we will analyze:

  • The past performance and outlook for the art market
  • The investment case and risks of art as an asset class
  • Best practices for investing in art wisely as part of a diversified portfolio
  • Future trends that could impact returns from art investments

By the end, readers will have the knowledge needed to determine if art investing represents a suitable wealth-building strategy that aligns with their risk tolerance and financial objectives.

The Market Size, Past Returns, and Outlook for Art

The first step in evaluating art as a capital allocation option is to analyze the scope, historical performance, and investment outlook for the global art market.

According to the 2022 Art Basel & UBS Art Market Report, 2021 sales in the global art market reached $65.1 billion, rebounding strongly from the pandemic-impacted year of 2020 and marking the highest-ever level of spending. This reflects a 29% year-over-year (YoY) increase from 2020.

To put this figure in perspective, $65.1 billion would place the value of global art sales in 2021 firmly amongst the 100 highest national GDPs globally, ahead of nations like Luxembourg, Slovenia, and Kuwait.

Other key stats about the global art market today include:

  • There are 310,000 businesses operating in the art, antiques and collectibles trade globally
  • Over 32 million high net worth individuals (HNWIs) collect art and antiques around the world
  • The United States accounts for 42% of the global art market by value – more than China and the UK combined

So in terms of market size, art constitutes a massive global industry today with no shortage of wealthy buyers and investors participating around the world.

Historical Returns and Outlook for Art Investing

So how have actual financial returns from art investing stacked up historically? Many industry analysts point to the Mei Moses Family of Fine Art Indexes as the leading benchmark.

Key returns figures from the Mei Moses Index include:

  • 15.34% – Average annual return for Postwar & Contemporary Art between 2002 to 2021
  • 14.99% – Average annual returns for Impressionist & Modern Art from 2002 to 2021
  • 10.85% – Trailing 10-year returns as of 2021 across all fine art classified by Mei Moses

These figures compare very favorably to returns generated in stock and bond markets over the same historical periods. For context, the S&P 500 produced annualized returns of around 8% over the past 20 years.

The outlook for continued price appreciation in investment-grade art also appears healthy. Wealth managers predict that:

  • Millennial collectors are poised to drive a generational shift in the art buyer base over the next decade
  • Rising billionaires in Asia, Middle East, and developing nations will further expand the pool of art buyers globally

Bain & Company projects the value of the global art & collectibles market increasing to $2.7 trillion by 2026 – more than 4X its existing size today. This anticipated growth leads many financial analysts to feel optimistic about art retaining long-term value.

The Investment Case for Art

Given the recent returns and positive outlook discussed above, why exactly is art considered an emerging investment asset class versus just a decorative object or luxury good?

There are several compelling arguments driving adoption of art as a wealth management asset:

Inflation Hedging Properties

The potential for artworks to hold their value or appreciate during periods of high inflation is a major investment attribute. This is due to key characteristics like:

  • Scarcity – The limited supply of works by blue-chip artists keeps values high amidst rising prices for goods & services
  • Intrinsic value – Perceived cultural/social significance of fine art creates baseline intrinsic worth
  • Hard asset – Artworks’ tangible nature retains inherent value better than intangible assets during inflation

The Citi Global Art Market Chart shows art boasting a 0.55 correlation with inflation historically – greater than gold (0.25), stocks (-0.16), bonds (-0.36), and commodities (0.53). This suggests art does function reasonably well as an inflation hedge.

Non-Correlated Returns

The change in art’s valuations tends to have low correlation to returns from traditional stock and bond markets historically.

This gives art a ‘non-correlated‘ profile – meaning its spikes and dips in value generally don’t mirror broader macro-economic volatility or recessionary cycles impacting stocks/bonds due to the unique nature of this asset class.

So adding art investment exposure can potentially improve portfolio returns for investors during periods when financial markets struggle.

Rising Global Wealth

As the world adds 5.3 million new millionaires annually, this greatly expands the addressable market of art buyers year after year.

Rising disposable income and wealth creation globally feeds continued demand for scarce high-end artworks – providing fundamental support for higher valuations over long-horizons.

Portability & Storage Value

Artworks own the unique advantage of being portable – able to be packed up and transported globally. This makes art a favored asset of wealthy families and art dealers seeking an overseas store of value.

Unlike real estate or large securities positions which face barriers moving across borders, high-value artwork enjoys more flexibility in changing domiciles easily amidst instability caused by war, political shifts, policy changes, natural disasters, or civil strife in any given region.

In summary, these underlying pillars – inflation hedging ability, non-correlation, wealth creation trends, and portability – constitute the core investment case for assigning permanent capital to art.

The Risk Profile of Art Investing

While the drivers behind adopting art as an investment appear compelling, prudent investors must also carefully evaluate the sizable risks involved:

Illiquidity Challenges

Lack of liquidity poses arguably the single greatest hazard for art investors. The reality is the art market contains a very limited pool of motivated buyers for rare or high-end collectibles.

So while leading auction houses may quote seemingly objective price levels, actually finding a counterparty bidder to complete a sale is far from guaranteed.

Evidence of this liquidity risk shows in current inventory levels of major auction houses – with Christie’s totaling around $1.3 billion of art waiting to be sold today relative to just $420 million pre-pandemic.

Such inventory build highlights the difficulty translate art’s theoretical market value into real cash value in practice – a delta which creates major holding risks for investors.

High Transaction Fees

The specialized nature of art brokerage, authentication, restoration, insurance coverage, climate controlled storage and transportation/shipping leads to substantial intermediary fees embedded into the art trade.

Over a multi-year holding period, these frictional costs can potentially erode away a significant portion of an art investor’s nominal returns. These sunk expenses connected to illiquidity must be accounted for.

On the plus side, tech innovation holds promise to lower art trading fees over time via enhanced price transparency, decentralized exchanges for collectors, and lower-cost digital authentication/appraisals.

Highly Subjective Pricing

Unlike shares trading in financial markets, professionally appraised artworks have valuations reflecting largely subjective opinions rooted in recent comparable sales. This makes pricing opaque and volatile.

Just ask the art dealer who incorrectly estimated a cardboard box piece by the late artist Robert Gober was worth around $100,000 – before it was auctioned off by Sotheby’s for a stunning $419,000 last year!

While seasoned art investors build knowledge to make educated bidding decisions, lack of valuations transparency remains an enduring risk factor.

Poor-Performing Artists/Periods/Styles

Another real danger from concentrating art investments into just one or two artists, genres, or eras reflects potential changes in collector tastes over longer holding periods.

Critically-acclaimed artists can fall out of favor amongst cultural gatekeepers and seeing lagging valuations as a result. Entire artistic movements like Pop Art and Modernism have oscillated wildly in perceived esteem and pricing over recent decades as critic preferences evolved.

Since the value of art directly flows from perception of social significance assigned by curators, historians, and collectors, shifts in these subjective assessments introduces tremendous uncertainty into art’s pricing outlook decades down the line – especially for contemporary works.

In essence, investing in artists becomes highly speculative once removed from auction results available for long-proven Old Master painters. Investors struggle gauging whether the likes of Basquiat, Richter, or Hockney will genuinely stand the test of time and retain demand or stagnate into obscure footnotes.

Diversification across enough artists, schools of art, mediums, and collecting niches allows prudent investors to mitigate the risks that certain art assets weaken substantially in appeal over lengthy holding periods. But uncertainty tied to long-run artist performance looms as an ever-present potential downside.

Best Practices for Investing in Art

While no capital allocation strategy is entirely risk-free, following prudent guidelines allows art collectors to craft what potentially resembles an institutional-grade investing approach:

Prioritize Investment-Minded Purchasing

The first key practice involves curating an investment mandate – ranking priorities like target returns, liquidity needs, risk limits, capital base, holding timeline and other factors integral to strategic acquisition decisions.

Such an institutional policy statement provides the decision-making roadmap often missing for collectors purchasing art purely on emotional appeal rather cash flow optimization.

Diversify Across Investment Factors

As Modern Portfolio Theory states, smart diversification distributes risk across differentiated return drivers like:

  • Artists/genres/mediums/periods
  • Geographies/collecting niches
  • Emerging art movements & artists

This diversified portfolio approach allows art investors participation in potential upside across wider segments – while using allocation size to the highest conviction artists/periods to manage overall volatility risk to returns.

Implement Governance Oversight

Wealthy families add external art advisory panels or specialist consultants to introduce governance oversight around acquisition decisions, accounting, risk management, authentication, storage/conservation and periodic valuation updates.

Such institutionalized stewardship introduces fiduciary principles into art collecting – essential for maximizing portfolio returns over long-holding horizons.

Secure Robust Insurance Coverages

Protecting high-value art assets via tailored property & casualty plus transit/shipping insurance represents vital risk mitigation. Brands like Art Insurance Now deliver customized coverage for galleries, museums, collectors and advisers – shielding irreplaceable artworks from arson, floods, quakes, theft and logistics mishaps globally.

Embrace Tech Innovations

From blockchain-verified provenance tracking to AI-powered sentiment analytics on artists, tech advancements offer immense potential to lower art investment costs, risks and friction points.

Just as star fund managers leverage alternative datasets for money management, art investors can potentially exploit technology to perfect acquisition timing, authentication, storage and sales execution.

Future Trends Shaping Art Investing

Looking ahead, shifting collector demographics, buying patterns and preferences stand to uniquely reshape risk factors for the art investing environment:

Millennial & Gen Z Appeal

Younger art buyers display greater demand for digital art plus contemporary movements like Street Art, guerrilla art collectives and experiential installations – fleeing Old Master paintings favored by many Baby Boomers.

How today’s avant garde works retain long-run appeal remains a pivotal unknown in projecting future art investment returns.

Fractionalized Ownership

Platforms allowing accredited investors purchase tokenized ‘shares’ in iconic artworks constitutes an emerging trend making the asset class more accessible.

But whether fractionalized art ownership dampens or elevates price levels by tapping new sources of capital makes difficult predicting.

Metaverse Galleries

Virtual art viewings and gallery showrooms inside leading metaverse worlds like Spatial and Decentraland provide another portal introducing younger generations to physical works they can purchase.

This digital route for discovering artists alters dynamics between physical and NFT art that investors must track.

Behavioral Psychology

As art investing evolves increasingly mainstreamed, cognitive and emotional bias by yield-chasing collectors poses its own new risk factor to price stability.

Herding behavior that propagates harmful booms & busts proves endemic across assets like crypto, funds, and real estate – art may see similar pressures building in future auction hype cycles.

Concluding Thoughts

There exists no definitive verdict on whether art constitutes a smart portfolio addition generating institutional-tier long run returns for investors focused on wealth preservation and growth.

Like any alternative asset category, investing in art works brings unique complexities. Navigating illiquidity, subjective valuations, and changes in collector tastes mandates customized strategies embracing diversification, governance and technology.

What does seem clear is that art investments bear monitoring as a potentially non-correlated way to offset volatility risk in traditional stock/bond allocations over the long run – especially for strategic investors able to underwrite some liquidity risk.

Global wealth creation feeding a larger addressable pool of motivated art buyers also bodes well for keeping upward pressure on rare investment-grade cultural artifacts.

Further financialization influences and fractional ownership tools likely make art investing accessible to far more investors in future. So rather than a static market, art constitues an evolivng asset category with an investment outlook that rewards patient capital and prudent diversification principles.

Scott D. Clary

Leave a Reply

Skip to content